|
Published: April 20, 2008
“Stop harassing the poor!”
Catholic Worker among homeless advocates giving LA’s tactics to clean up downtown an unfavorable review
Although Los Angeles police and city government claim they have made Skid Row a safer place, their efforts continue to meet with criticism from some homeless advocates, including from the Los Angeles Catholic Worker.
Over the past year, arrests on Skid Row – known as a bazaar for street drugs -- have risen and crime on the whole has declined, said the April 14 Los Angeles Times. At least violent crime has leveled off, but property crime has risen 60%. Both residents of downtown and city officials say the rise in property crime can be explained by the opening of upscale loft apartments, posh restaurants and bars, and galleries, attracting well-heeled shoppers and clubbers.
A year-and-a-half ago, LA police chief William Bratton instituted the “Safer City Initiative,” placing 50 additional police officers on Skid Row. Like similar initiatives elsewhere in the city, this initiative targeted “the criminal element, which preys upon the homeless and mentally ill,” said Bratton. The initiative is based on the “broken windows” theory that, by targeting minor crimes, police can have an impact on major crime, such as drug dealing and prostitution.
These minor, “quality of life crimes” include urinating in public, having milk crates or shopping carts, jay walking, or simply standing or sitting on the streets. Targeting them has resulted in a decrease in homeless encampments. It also resulted in the decrease of homeless who, as the Times reported in February 2007, have gone to other communities, straining resources of service providers elsewhere. A January 2007 police count found the homeless population downtown had dropped 46% from September 2006.
Dissatisfaction with the Safer City Initiative erupted on April 1 when Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa came to Skid Row to give a press conference praising the initiative’s progress. As the mayor began his address, five protesters from the Catholic Worker soup kitchen across the street appeared with signs and, standing behind Villaraigosa, began shouting, “Stop harassing the poor!” “The poor need housing, not jails!” “Three thousand people arrested for jay walking in one year!”
Villaraigosa continued with his prepared remarks, speaking of the streetlights placed on Skid Row and the hundred more that the city soon will add. He spoke of the need for housing and services. When he noted that, at the initiative’s inception, conditions on Skid Row were out of control, the protesters erupted again, drowning the mayor out, one shouting, “Put ‘em in jail, that’s really good.” Villaraigosa said, “The homeless were preyed upon on a daily basis” -- at which a protester shouted, “Being preyed upon by the police!”
When Villaraigosa mentioned a basketball program for children at Gladys Park on Skid Row, a protester shouted, “The children don’t live on Skid Row!” To which Villaraigosa responded, “and neither do you.”
A Times article noted that two of the protesters live in Boyle Heights and one in West Covina. The article did not mention that the remaining protesters, Jeff Dietrich and Katherine Morris, both live at the Catholic Worker house on Skid Row and have done so since the 1970s.
Posted Sunday, April 20, 2008 7:07 AM By John L. Sillasen
The poor will always be with us, according to Jesus. So where are they supposed to live? I wonder what Catholic Worker would be able to do with the funds that the mayor spends on fifty additional cops on skid row, ie, at least 5 million bucks a year? And with new street lights and stuff, maybe more like 10 million dollars per year? Yes, there definitely are seeming insurmountable problems with the poor, but will our society take the route its taken with unborn babies ... just kill them or let them starve to death? As for any claim that CW is Marxist, I do not believe it because the Marxists kill their unwanted, and the Catholics give them life; therefore, Catholic Workers are Catholic and not marxists.
|
Posted Sunday, April 20, 2008 9:01 AM By James
We should get a new Mayor.
|
Posted Sunday, April 20, 2008 10:15 AM By Camille
What is the writer trying to tell us? I can see several interpretations.
1. The so-called Catholic Workers are actually in cahoots with LA Mayor since the police apparently did little to prevent their close proximity to him nor silence them.
2. The Catholic Workers are protecting the criminal element within skid row.
3. Out of town agitators took advantage of this situation to intimidate the Mayor with their ability to penetrate the crowd and demand more government/tax funded services.
Which is it?
|
Posted Sunday, April 20, 2008 11:47 AM By Sick and Tired
I don't pretend to have a solution, but I do have years of firsthand experience in this area. I can say with certainty that Villaraigosa doesn't care where the homeless go, as long as it it out of downtown, and preferably Los Angeles altogether - and statistically, his plan seems to be working. The downtown renovation and revitalization is a primary Villaraigosa priority, as it will enhance his image and increase the tax base as high-end commercial and residential properties move in. In the late 1980's, I was an LAFD paramedic assigned to the Skid Row station for two years. It is Fire Station 9 on 7th and San Julian (and nearby at FS 4 near Olvera Street for another two). Mayor Bradley handled things differently, but I don't believe he had the personal political aspirations of Villaraigosa. This mayor has his eye on Washington, so cleaning up downtown and reducing (which is actually just displacing) crime, is high on his agenda and will be something you will hear him use to his favor in the future. The person who shouted that the children don't live in Skid Row is absolutely right, and the homeless aren't generally big sportsfans, in fact, they are generally nocturnal, sleeping during the safer daylight hours, as this is a key survival mechanism. No, I'm afraid this is simply another element of the mayor's downtown revitalization. In my opinion, this is all about HIM and not some altruistic calling to end the plight of Skid Row. Spending millions to add 50 cops to the Central Division Station is obiously not a move intended to "help the poor" as the mayor would like you to believe. Like most politicians, we can tell he is lying because his lips are moving. This is simply an "exodus incentive program" aimed to help "persuade" the homeless in the area to continue to push their shopping carts somewhere else ... preferably a continued westward expansion toward the People's Republic of Santa Monica.
|
Posted Sunday, April 20, 2008 12:50 PM By Jan Wnek
John Sillasen:
You're on the right track here......gracias a Dios!
Pace e bene,
Jan
|
Posted Sunday, April 20, 2008 1:19 PM By John L. Sillasen
1. Why would the mayor be afraid of the CW, since they all know one another? 2. The poor are in skid row, which is why the CW are there. 3. The demonstrators are all CW ... they do not threaten the mayor, and the police know this, and thus do not intimidate them. The writer is trying to tell us that the Mayor wants to clean up skid row for safety of business patrons, and that CW is upset because it is not so good for the poor there. Camille, you obviously have the solution which Jesus Himself has long sought ... would you be so kind as to reveal it?
|
Posted Monday, April 21, 2008 6:10 AM By Don Timmerman
Again, the Catholic Workers come forth defending the rights of the poor, whom they see as Christ Himself. I am privileged to be around Catholic Workers in Wisconsin. Mos of what they do for others goes unnoticed, except for the needy whom they serve. When I speak of needy people I am not just talking about people who are materially poor. I am talking about all of us who have a ways to go to be like Christ. Thank you, Catholic Workers of L.A. In Solidarity, Don Timmerman
|
Posted Monday, April 21, 2008 12:53 PM By Fr. M.P.
So the "2007 police count found the homeless population downtown had dropped 46% from September 2006." Notice there is no mention of any benefits to the homeless. So where did they go? What did the city do to help them have a place to live? Or were they swept under someone else rug? As to statistics, what evidence is there of how much this "broken window" model of police work actually improves things?
|
Posted Monday, April 21, 2008 3:07 PM By Thomas Miles
John L. Sillasen, For once I am in complete agreement with you with regard to this matter, the Catholic Worker movement is far from being marxist! John, Should we join the Catholic Worker movement, we could have some fine debates in person!! Thomas
|
Posted Tuesday, April 22, 2008 7:24 AM By John L. Sillasen
Thomas Miles, I love what the CW does for the poor, but their rhetoric is too austere for me. When I think of CW (they send me their paper), I think of the Poverello -- not so much the CW rhetoric, but their actions for Christ.
|
Posted Tuesday, April 22, 2008 5:49 PM By JohnnyV13
Fr. M.P. The broken window theory came from a professor who noticed that high crime neighborhoods had far greater signs of neglect and vandalism than low crime neighborhoods in the same general area. From what I understand, this theory is highly regarded in the academic community and has been supported by numerous studies (the professor who coined it was offered 1 million salary to move to a new university). I don't know much about it, other than those few facts. From what I understand, visible signs of lawbreaking tend to encourage more lawbreaking according to this theory. Of course, the problem here might not be so much a problem with the theory as it is in its application. The mayor seems to want to scour the streets of the homeless, to encourage high end businesses to move in. Broken window theory seems more like his justification, rather than the driving force behind what he's trying to accomplish.
|
Posted Tuesday, April 22, 2008 8:45 PM By John L. Sillasen
Finally, evidence that a professor has made an evolutionary leap by discovering that neglected property is more of a target of criminals than tidy property. JohnnyV13, I think you're revealing your sense of humor here: The university sends him packing with a million dollars ... I'm trying to picture this ... uh, I get it. They fund him to go to a dump of a college and spruce it up, to see if it then turns out graduates who are good citizens and not politicians.
|
Posted Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:21 AM By Fr. M.P.
JohnnyV13, thanks for the info. But is there any empirical evidence that the broken window theory is true, rather than just being some highly regarded academic theory? And regardless of that, what evidence is there that homeless people cause the broken windows? Seems like an excuse to me.
|
© California Catholic Daily 2008. All Rights Reserved.
|