Skip Navigation Links
Home
Donate
Free News via Email
Subscribe for a Friend
Send News Tip
Contact Us
Search
About Us
Is California Catholic Daily important to you?
You can help keep us online!
Advertise with us
Currently more than 150,000 visitors read CalCatholic.com
Churches Worth Driving To

* Submit Your Church *

News from the Trenches
She Reached Over and Squeezed Roger's Hand...
Notes from a
Cultural Madhouse
The End...
CLASSIFIED ADS
My Friends Jewelry - “Home of the Original Pillow Rosary”: Our Pillow Rosaries are shorter i...(read more)
San Diego - Father Joe's St. Vincent de Paul Village: Help us keep all of our neighbors...(read more)
San Marcos: St. Joseph Academy is a lay run, traditional K-12 school that teaches the C...(read more)
See All Classified Ads
Submit Classified Ad
CALENDAR
Montclair 40 Days For Life: Montclair joins 100's of cities across America for 40DaysforLife...(read more)
Fresno: "Latin Mass 101: A Workshop for Curious Catholics": The Fresno Traditional Mass Soci...(read more)
Santa Barbara/Oceanside/Danville: Silent Ignatian retreats, based on the Spiritual...(read more)
See All Calendar Items
Submit Calendar Item
LATEST FEEDBACK
Pointing the media in the wrong direction? Dear CCD Editor, In 1997, Pope John Paul II decided that the... [The Truth Hurts - 2/8/2010 8:43:40 PM]
Lay woman named to key Vatican job The biggest speculative evidence, Tom, is that if the Cathol... [JLS - 2/8/2010 7:57:56 PM]
Cardinal Levada to Nebraska Rick, Thanks for clarifying the matter of "St. Peter's To... [Kenneth M. Fisher - 2/8/2010 7:18:58 PM]
Churches Worth Driving To Has the Tridentine Mass which Monsignor Sweeney fought so lo... [Kenneth M. Fisher - 2/8/2010 6:57:01 PM]
eHarmony caves Felicidad. No offense to Hispanic/Latino cmmty, which gener... [kathy - 2/8/2010 6:56:19 PM]

Links to Other Sites
Prior Site Archives
Article Archives

“Who elected them to Congress?”

Abortion advocates target Catholic bishops over role in healthcare bill


Now that the U.S. House has narrowly approved a national healthcare bill, abortion advocates are taking aim at Catholic bishops and seeking to exact political retribution on pro-life legislators who insisted on a provision banning federal abortion funding as a condition of their support.

In an item published Nov. 9 by Politico.com under the heading “IRS should scrutinize bishops,” Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-San Rafael, asks of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, “Who elected them to Congress?” and suggests the Church’s tax-exempt status should be reviewed. Woolsey said the bishops’ support of the Stupak amendment “was more than mere advocacy” and said the bishops “managed to bully members of Congress to vote for added restrictions on a perfectly legal surgical procedure.”

The Sacramento Bee reported on Nov. 11 that former state legislator Deborah Ortiz, a pro-abortion Democrat from Sacramento who now works as vice president of public affairs for Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, had written a letter “expressing dismay” to two of three Democrats from California who voted for the abortion-funding restrictions. Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, headquartered in San Jose, operates 33 clinics and 23 “satellite sites” in 40 counties in California and northern Nevada. According to its fiscal year 2009 annual report, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte performed 15,395 abortions and had a budget of just over $81 million. Of that, more than 87% came from government sources.

Ortiz, said the Bee, sent a Nov. 9 letter to Rep. Dennis Cardoza, D-Merced, and Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, both of whom voted for the Stupak Amendment, which prohibits federal funding for abortion as part of the healthcare bill. (Also voting for the amendment was Rep. Joe Baca, D-San Bernardino.) In the letter, Ortiz asked Cardoza and Costa to explain their votes.

"Given our long friendship and history of working on behalf of those who have little to no access to health care, I welcome an explanation of your vote," said the letter according to the Bee. "Absent an explanation, I can only assume that the decision was a political rather than a policy decision."

Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, took direct aim at Catholic bishops in a statement “condemning” the House’s passage of the Stupak Amendment. “It is extremely unfortunate that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and anti-choice opponents were able to hijack the health care reform bill in their dedicated attempt to ban all legal abortion in the United States,” said Richards’ statement, calling the pro-life position an “extreme, ideological agenda.” Richards said that “Planned Parenthood will work with its allies in the Senate to ensure that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and those who oppose abortion do not once again hijack the legislative process in their ongoing campaign to make abortion illegal.”

In an email alert sent to Planned Parenthood backers across the country, the abortion giant said, “We're urging you to make your voice heard and tell President Obama to live up to his campaign commitment and stand with us to protect women's health today and every single day until real reform is passed.”

NARAL-Pro-Choice America (formerly called the National Abortion Rights Action League) also issued a statement promising to marshal pro-abortion forces as the healthcare bill is taken up in the Senate. “Nancy Keenan , president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, called House passage of a stunning last-minute anti-choice amendment to health reform an outrageous blow to women's freedom and privacy -- and she vowed to fight to remove this provision as the process goes to the Senate,” said a statement issued by NARAL.

In the meantime, the Associated Press moved a story published in newspapers across the country under the heading, “The Influence Game: Bishops shape health care bill.” Among other things, the AP story reported that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco, telephoned Rome to speak with former Washington, D.C., Archbishop Theodore McCarrick on Friday, Nov. 6, the day before the House narrowly approved the Stupak Amendment. Cardinal McCarrick served as Archbishop of Washington from 2001-2006.

“Catholic bishops have emerged as a formidable force in the health care overhaul fight, using their clout with millions of Catholics and working behind the scenes in Congress to get strong abortion restrictions into the House bill,” said the AP. “They don't spend a dime on what is legally defined as lobbying, but lawmakers and insiders recognize that the bishops' voices matter -- and they move votes. Representatives for the bishops were in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's Capitol suite negotiating with top officials last Friday evening as they reached final terms of the agreement. Earlier in the day, Pelosi, a Catholic and an abortion rights supporter, had been on the phone to Rome with Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, Washington's former archbishop, on the subject.”

According to the AP, Boston Archbishop Cardinal Sean O'Malley made a private appeal to President Barack Obama on federal abortion funding “near the church altar at the early September funeral for Sen. Edward M. Kennedy.” The AP also said that bishops across the U.S. “quietly called their congressmen and senators to weigh in.”

The intervention of the Church in the healthcare debate left pro-abortion forces “fuming,” said the AP, quoting Eleanor Smeal of the Feminist Majority saying, “They (the bishops) dictated this, and it's totally inappropriate -- it's blatant interference between church and state.”


READER COMMENTS

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:27 AM By LAUREL
Why is it when Catholics "finally" speak up and speak up with some force every attempt is made to quiet them and discredit them. Where's our freedom of speech???

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:34 AM By Ron
A better question might be , who in the world was amoral enough to elect Ms. Woolsey to congress ? I think Ms. Woolsey shows her true colors when she describes the murder of innocent babies as " a perfectly legal SURGICAL procedure". God Bless and may God protect the unborn.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:39 AM By St. Christopher
Ms. Smeal is completely incorrect regarding her views of the "church and state" separation that courts believe is necessary under the US Constitution. As background, courts have really invented and extended this concept, which does not even appear in the Constitution. Moreover, religious institutions are not forbidden to have involvement in all phases of social and political life, particularly if its basic beliefs are involved. Being against what a religion believes is the taking of life is far different than giving church members voting cards, or even in inviting candidates to churches, an activity that involves many Protestant churches, and which has brought many liberal Democratic candidates to prominence. The real issue here is that Democrats, and pro-abortion capitalists simply dislike interference in their plans to subvert taxpayer choice, and the democratic process. These people disdain religion and disdain most other people. Sounds a lot like homosexual interest groups, who wail for the right to marriage while knifing families and religion that oppose them. It does bring a smile, though, to read about the valiant Cardinal O'Malley who, while bringing great scandal and shame upon the entire Catholic Church, has a sotto voce discussion with our good President about abortion (so he says). Maybe there is some truth to the widely stated dictum that there would be no abortion if Catholics lived their faith.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 6:19 AM By Bud
Wouldn''t you know the only threat the likes of Eleanor Smeal of the Feminist Majority saying "it's blatant interference between church and state" The bishops are the representatives of the citizens in the Church and citizens and voters themselves. Are these bishops not equal to a lobbyist although they are not throwing money to Pelosi, Inc., ????

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 6:27 AM By OneoftheSheep
Hmmm. Should I listen to the shepherds? Or should I listen to the wayward sheep Debora Ortiz? Let me think about that. Debora Ortiz refused to hear Msgr Kavanagh out before a key vote in the CA state legislature. Fox that she is, she took a backdoor to elude hearing from her former pastor at St. Rose who sought to educate her on the errors of her heretical ways regarding abortion. Debora Ortiz is now making a living on the backs of innocent unborn children as she promotes Banned Parenthood's Culture of Death agenda. Shame on you, DeboraOrtiz. Shame on you, Banned Parenthood! "In the face of the instruments of destruction and death, in the face of violence and cruelty, we have no other recourse but to God, with our words and with our hearts. We are neither strong nor powerful, but we know that God does not leave unanswered the entreaty of those who turn to Him with sincere faith, especially when the present and future destiny of millions of people is at stake." JPII, address, Rome, 1993

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 6:28 AM By OneoftheSheep
If the pro-abortionists are fuming, then the angels and saints are beaming. Praise be to God, the Father of us all, who protects us in times of adversity and purification.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 6:42 AM By Dana
True to their natures, these ghouls from the culture of death expect everyone to think and act like them. If voters as well as representatives don't toe the line, then they feel justified in harassing, investigating, firing and bullying their 'adversaries'.These mean-spirited, anti-life, anti-independent toadies are definitely coming into their own as they gain power in the press and political arena and ironically under the euphemisms of 'choice', multi-culturalism' and 'diversity'...as in 'love is hate' , 'peace is war' and 'status-quo is change'. What is also very strange is that just now I clicked on spell check because a red line is under 'multi-culturalism' and it spelled out mufti. haha

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 6:45 AM By Rick
After reading the article, one might ask, "Who elected Planned Parenthood, Naral, other pro-choice organizations, the unions, and other anti-life special interest groups?" What hypocrisy!

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 6:45 AM By rhonda
It is amazes me that when the Bishops are in line with Democrats' side regarding civil rights or immigration, etc., Democratic leadership shout from the tallest buildings that they are grateful of the Bishops support. But when it comes to abortion, they vilify any Bishop that speaks out against it.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:00 AM By Thomas Edward Miles
GREAT NEWS! Good for the Bishops! I am enjoying planned parenthood go nuts, if anyone is a bully it is planned parenthood!

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:05 AM By David
No one elected me to congress either, but I can still speak out all I want about the health care bill. So can the Bishops and anyone else for that matter. The barely disguised attempt to extinguish a Catholic voice in the health care issue ignores the political realitiy that the US Catholic Bishops are in the game and not getting out -- ever. Raising the shiboleth of the separation of church and state won't work. The Pelosi-McCarrick telephone conversation is scary, however. McCarrick has become a self-proclaimed ambassador to the middle east, a wannabe deal maker/breaker, and loves to bask in the limelight. What sort of deal is he making with Pelosi and on who's behalf?

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:10 AM By JLS
Woolsey and Ortiz should be in a dungeon somewhere.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:23 AM By Tee
Let's get this straight: elected officials can lobby, vote for immoral issues, but Catholic bishops, and others of good will, cannot lobby for moral issues. Is that the deal? Actually, in reality, whose purview, responsibility is morality any way?

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:22 AM By Victor M. Fierro
Catholic Bishops have an obligation to work against abortion at any level.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:14 AM By Rick DeLano
Thomas Edward Miles......I simply cannot believe it. You have made a Catholic comment. Pigs are flying.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:27 AM By Dan
"GREAT NEWS! Good for the Bishops! I am enjoying planned parenthood go nuts, if anyone is a bully it is planned parenthood!" And I am absolutely delighted to agree with Thomas Edward Miles for a change. Carry on, princes of the Church!

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:43 AM By ted
In the worst case, the Church loses the tax exemption. One baby saved is worth all the taxes that would have to be paid while fighting the battle in court.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:21 AM By Laurette Elsberry
I have observed life-long Catholic Deborah Ortiz at work promoting the destruction of the pre-born since she was first stumping for election to the Sacramento City Council in 1993. From the Council she went to the California Assembly, then up to the California Senate. Her ambition to get into Congress were thwarted when incumbent pro-abort Robert Matsui died in office and his widow took over. Termed out of the Senate, Ortiz now is a money-raiser VP for the biggest killer in California - Planned Parenthood. I'm surprised that Obama has not elevated her to a higher position. Maybe later....

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:46 AM By RayC55
So it's a "legal surgical procedure". So is breast augmentation, rhinoplasty, and a dozen other procedures.But they are not covered under your normal medical expenses as they are elective surgery. Please tell me what type of disease is pregnancy?

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 2:24 PM By Mark from PA
Thomas Edward Miles, I agree with your post of 7 AM also.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:03 PM By Lisa
First, the label of Pelosi being "a Catholic and an abortion rights supporter" just proves the ignorance of the writer being that there is NO SUCH THING! However, I find it extremely funny how the culture of death cries foul on the bishops in that “They don't spend a dime on what is legally defined as lobbying"; don't they realize that sounds a lot like what the majority of Americans want, i.e. NOT HAVING speacial interest money buying policy?! It gives me pride that the bishops words hold more weight than money with some of our elected officials. And as far as I can sum up, the bishops are Americans, so they have every right to petitions their representatives. Then there are those that keep asking who elected them (bishops) into Congress or why are they a part of this healthcare debacle; well, just how many of this country's hospital are run by Catholics?! I'm curious to know if anybody has an idea, for a have a feeling that it's a rather large percentage. I read a comment by someone on another site which made sense in that he figured that if every American should be required to pay for abortions since it's considered a right of those who seek one, then everyone should have a gun given to them in the same sense since it is our right to own one... The day Planned Parenthood is sent to hell will be a glorious time to be on this planet; I pray that that ex-director Abbey Johnson reveals some of their questionable operating methods to the point where that will be treated as Acorn was by the people.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:30 PM By Anne T.
Yes, Thomas Edward Miles, if you keep up the good work (ideas) in your last post of 7:00 a.m., you might not be far from the Kingdom.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:14 PM By garvan
There was a heated and contentious meeting in Pelosi's office the night before the vote. Pro-death congressthugs were berating Pelosi for allowing the Stupak amendment to come to a vote. She told them she had to go through that ritual in order to get enough votes for passage of the health bill. She assured them that the pro-life amendment would be discarded in the house-senate conference. This brings up an interesting question: just how prolife are the "pro-life" Dems, in that being DC insiders, they KNOW their amendment was to be discarded later. The TRUE prolifers would therefore have voted against the entire health bill which, BTW, is decidedly anti-life, considering that it constitutes a death sentence for many seniors.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:26 PM By betty
Just one question. Why doesn't my parish priest ever speak about abortion and what a great evil it is? I asked him if I could put some pro-Life items in the places where there are empty spaces on the bulletin board at the rear of the church and he answered ,"I don't want anything to do with you." I asked the deacon if he would be willing to speak about abortion since the parish priest doesn't and he told me that he would get back to me and said that of course he couldn't do anything with ut the pastor's permission. I never heard from him again..

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:48 PM By JLS
The govt will not remove the Church's tax exemption ... to do so would unleash the downfall of liberal government, and they know it.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:49 PM By lyndon
The bishops were right to fight this bill.Even as the pro-choice provisions were defeated the spread of pro-abortion and homosexual interest are spreading throughout the world. Hillary Clinton is here in the philippines and was sanctimonious but egregious in talking for pro-choice, and portraying those who are against it as outmoded. That kind of arguement reminds me of  the communists belief they are the wave of the future and look what happened to it. Sadly for  a few loud Americans the protests are no longer for human rights but deviant evil practices that calls for justice by God.This fight is increasing especially when people with a Foreign Secretary position talk about it in a formal press conference but lets pray and support the American bishops the fight is theirs to prevent this double evil to becoming a way of life.

Posted Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:19 PM By mark mitchell
O please let me enjoy the blisses of schadenfreud (hope I spelled it right), re the "fuming" of the abortobots, who are so ANGRY (LOVE IT!) because for once the Catholic Bishops came through and really ACTED like the SUCCESSORS TO THE APOSTLES that they are vis-a-vis their heavy influence in keeping the Stupak amendment in the otherwise execrable healthcare bill passed by the maniacal Pelosi-driven House. ANYTIME the death-dealing radical liberal abortobot Democrats suffer a defeat @ the hands of pro-life, I RELISH THE MOMENT and AM DELIRIOUSLY in joy over their pain, because its so well-deserved! Nuff said!---GOD BLESS ALL PRO-LIFE WARRIORS, AND EVERYONE ELSE AS WELL, (EVEN the abortobots?!? ) Don't know if I REALLY mean that last sentence----MARKRITE

Posted Friday, November 13, 2009 5:53 AM By John D
Sure is interesting that these "celibate old men have morphed into a formidable "power player." Is this a case of Darwin's theory?

Posted Friday, November 13, 2009 7:12 AM By Brian
This issue is more about tax exempt status than abortion. Same question applies to Planned Parenthood and many in here would gladly question their tax status. In general, no organization, including a church, may qualify for IRC [Internal Revenue Code] 501(c)(3) [tax-exempt] status if a substantial part of its activities is attempting to influence legislation (commonly known as lobbying). An…organization may engage in some lobbying, but too much lobbying activity risks loss of tax-exempt status.”

Posted Friday, November 13, 2009 1:01 PM By Annika
Its my understanding that the IRS allows political advocacy on issues (not candidates) if no more than 10% of a tax-exempt, tax-deductable organization 501c3 resources are used. 501c4 lack tax deductability but can lobby officially on issues without limit. Of course, PACs exist without either, but are potent. Where the Anti-life Dems may inflict damage in the future is in introducing caps on charitable giving for the purpose of tax deductibility on your 1040. This serves the pro-aborts well because conservatives give as whole at much greater levels than liberals to churches and their charities. So watch for that punishment in future legislation.

Posted Friday, November 13, 2009 2:58 PM By JLS
Brian and Annika, be sure that the tax exemption came about as a buy off by the politicians. If they release the bishops from the bond of exemption, then the Church will restore good government to the land. That is why the corrupt government will not remove the exemption. It is a bribe and always was a bribe to keep the Church in line. But it started when the Church members were much less powerful than they are now. The only way liberals can stay at the top is to keep the bishops quiet. Soon as the bishops rise up, the liberals are toast.

Posted Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:19 PM By brian
Jls , Why does the church use the exemption if they would be more powerful without it ? Whatever. I'm all for taking the exemption away from many , but I see no reason that would increase the church's power. I would like many liberal ideas to be toast. just not all of them.

Posted Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:26 PM By Grisha
Annika: I thought it was 30%

Posted Saturday, November 14, 2009 9:41 PM By Angelo
Every American Citizen is supposed to be guaranteed freedom of speech. But if a Man becomes a member of the Roman Catholic Clergy. He in fact is stripped of his freedom of speech. This is a matter for the Supreme Court. I would enjoy seeing the Justices stumble all over themselves, trying to argue this question.

Posted Sunday, November 15, 2009 4:22 AM By Susan
All of this "protesting too much" on the part of the pro-aborts is just kabuki theatrics to distract people from the fact that the USCCB pressure tactics are actually the key enabling piece to getting the "health care" reform bill passed. Please, save your congratulations for the bishops for when they man up to defeat the bill itself, rather than putting lipstick (Stupak) on this pig of a bill.

Posted Monday, November 16, 2009 8:53 PM By JLS
brian, very simple: Jesus said to give unto Caesar what is his ... But this is not what happens now. The government is buying the Church. If the Church wants to be free of government control, then She has to pay the government instead of receive a paycheck from it.

Posted Tuesday, December 01, 2009 6:18 PM By brian
Jls . Probably a little late for an answer , but I'll ask again. why does the church take the exemption ? You keep saying the government is buying the church. The church is a willing participant and you dance around that fact.

Post your Comment
Name:
Email: (Optional: Will not display)
Comment:
 
Comments are limited to 1500 characters, and cannot contain offensive or libelous language. For security, comments cannot contain html tags, including < and > symbols - and NO URLS or LINKS. Comments will appear after they have been approved by the editor. Inclusion of your email address is optional so the editor may contact you.



Calcatholic Mobile
Optimized for your
mobile device













 
Visitors since January 1st, 2009:
javascript hit counter

website created by Vigil Studios © 2006 -  www.vigilstudios.com