Skip Navigation Links
Home
Donate
Free News via Email
Subscribe for a Friend
Send News Tip
Contact Us
Search
About Us
Is California Catholic Daily important to you?
You can help keep us online!
Advertise with us
Currently more than 150,000 visitors read CalCatholic.com
Churches Worth Driving To

* Submit Your Church *

News from the Trenches
“Something is telling me it isn't right" ...
Notes from a
Cultural Madhouse
The End...
Online Bachelor’s Degree program in business. Accelerated MBA program.
New Video. The Persecution of the Catholic Church in Mexico in the 1920's.
Be Aware! Your loved ones need your help in nursing homes.
CLASSIFIED ADS
Announcement - The Importance of Faith in our Lives: Whether it was resentment, anger, divor...(read more)
Announcement - Truth & Triumph: The Alliance Defense Fund introduces a new "online magazine...(read more)
Altar servers are needed for the Latin Tridentine Mass (Extraordinary Form), in Akron, Ohio....(read more)
See All Classified Ads
Submit Classified Ad
CALENDAR
El Cajon/La Mesa - A Mission on the Work of the Holy Angels: Preached by Fr. Titus...(read more)
San Diego/Scripps Ranch Area" Marriage is on trial in the state of California..read more)
San Diego - Mother of Life Conference: Presented by The Knights of Columbus, San Diego Chapt...(read more)
See All Calendar Items
Submit Calendar Item
LATEST FEEDBACK
“Ban on public prayers” I wonder if the ritual of beheading religious or other Chris... [JLS - 7/30/2010 11:17:27 PM]
“Inappropriate subject matter” When I was a kid, we formed up little posse groups for vario... [JLS - 7/30/2010 11:03:48 PM]
“The Holy Father's reflections on the central mysteries of our faith” THE HOLY FATHER has been under such "uninformed" attacks rec... [NUTUNE - 7/30/2010 10:11:02 PM]
Priest pay in San Jose jon, you're simply hooked by the system. Here is what I am ... [JLS - 7/30/2010 8:23:23 PM]
“Getting emails from Catholics” The word, "judge", seems to have a hidden meaning that only ... [JLS - 7/30/2010 6:24:11 PM]

Links to Other Sites
Prior Site Archives
Article Archives

Alphonse

A Self-Interview by Matthew Lickona


What is Alphonse?

It’s a five-issue comic book series I have written about eight lives that intersect after an abortion attempt gone horribly awry.

Meaning?

Well, the fetus survives the attempt. And then he escapes the abortion clinic. And eventually, he sets out on a mission of revenge. He’s not an ordinary fetus. Thanks to his unwitting mother’s use of various controlled substances, he is both intelligent and freakishly coordinated.

Good grief. Doesn’t this play into the “fetishize the fetus” mentality that pro-lifers are often accused of having? Always going on about the precious unborn baby, and effectively ignoring the plight of the woman in whose womb that baby is growing?

I hope not – in fact, I’m shooting for the opposite effect. Let me explain. In 2007, The Atlantic ran "The Sanguine Sex," an essay by Caitlin Flanagan that considered two books about the days before legalized abortion. The Choices We Made recounted the stories of pre-legal abortions, while The Girls Who Went Away considered the machinations of adoption in the case of unwanted pregnancy – young women being sent away to maternity homes, etc. In that essay, Flanagan wrote, "The history of abortion is a history of stories, and the ones that took place before Roe v. Wade are oftentimes so pitiable and heartbreaking that one of the most powerful tools of pro-choice advocates is simply telling them." I think this is true. It’s a hell of a thing to recite a principle like “a fetus is a person from the moment of conception” to a suffering woman whose story is genuinely tragic, and who regards her unwanted pregnancy as a disaster.

But later in the essay, Flanagan expressed sympathy for those who oppose abortion. Against the stories told by the women, she set an image: "An ultrasound image taken surprisingly early in pregnancy can stop me in my tracks. In it is much more than I want to know about the tiny creature whose destruction we have legalized: a beating heart, a human face, functioning kidneys, two waving hands that seem not too far away from being able to grasp and shake a rattle."

That was a brave admission on Flanagan’s part, and I don’t mean to take anything away from her courage in making it. But there is a way in which the image – with its exclusive focus on what’s in utero – remains outside the “history of abortion” that is “a history of stories.” What I’ve tried to do is to write the fetus into the story, but not in a way that excludes the mother. Or, for that matter, the doctor and nurse who attempt the abortion. It really is the story of eight lives – it’s just that Alphonse is one of them.

Still – isn’t the idea of a eight-month-old fetus scurrying around on a mission of revenge deeply creepy?

Absolutely. Alphonse is a living nightmare – I don’t think there’s any way around that. I think he’s akin to the Misfit in Flannery O’Connor’s short story “A Good Man is Hard to Find” – a twisted, violent soul who nonetheless bears a kind of prophetic witness, both in spite of the violence and, in a way, through it. (And no, I am not suggesting any kind of support here for actual violence in defense of the unborn – shooting doctors or bombing clinics or anything like that. Whatever else he is, the Misfit is a murderer. And Alphonse – well, all I’ll say is that he runs up against the fact that violence begets violence.)

Was Flanagan’s essay the source of inspiration for your story?

No – my inspiration was actually another comic character: Gary Cangemi’s Umbert the Unborn. I think I first encountered him in The National Catholic Register. Cangemi had created Umbert to manifest the personhood of the fetus, and to that end, he had endowed the little guy with reason, will, and a pretty thorough understanding of the outside world. In particular, Umbert knew about legalized abortion.

Umbert was (and remains) a cheerful fellow. But he got me to thinking: what if it were true? What if there really was a sentient fetus, suspended upside down in the dark, barely able to move, completely dependent on its mother for sustenance and care, and constantly aware of the fact that, at any moment, it could be killed? That if Mom made the fateful choice, there was nothing - not even the law - standing between it and violent death? Month after month in the dark, wondering when the axe might fall. What would that experience be like? What would it do to a person? Alphonse was born out of that question.

Is that why you’re doing this as a comic – because it’s a response to a comic?

Maybe that’s part of it – it certainly wasn’t conscious. I just found myself sketching Alphonse one day, and it grew from there. (Of course, I didn’t have anything like the skill it took to produce the comic – I found a professional artist for that.) It just felt right; like movies, comics can work on a really visceral level, because the pictures tell so much of the story. It’s a blending of those two opposed media that Flanagan mentioned – the story and the image.

What are you trying to do with the story?

There’s a way in which I’m not trying to do anything beyond telling a good story. That may sound like a bit of a dodge – sorry about that – and it certainly raises the question of what I mean by “a good story.” For starters, I think a good story is one that is true to its own interior workings, and not aimed at imparting some further message or teaching some lesson. Is there a pro-life dimension to a story about a fetus who is also manifestly a person? Sure. But at the same time, you could argue that there’s a pro-choice significance to a story about a fetus who threatens to destroy his mother.

I didn’t set out to write a story about abortion and then come up with Alphonse. It really was born out of my response to Umbert. But I do think it’s interesting that the project developed during a period when abortion was making more and more forays into pop culture storytelling. I’m thinking of films like Juno, Knocked Up, 4 Months 3 Weeks & 2 Days, Revolutionary Road, Vera Drake, Waitress, Bella, even Black Snake Moan and The Crime of Padre Amaro. Ben Folds sang about abortion and its effects in “Brick;” Sarah Silverman did a skit on abortion for her TV comedy show. It’s still a pretty radioactive topic, but there seems to be an increased willingness to engage abortion on the level of story. I’m hoping that Alphonse will be allowed to join the conversation.

So what now?

Right now, issue one of the series is available online at IndyPlanet.com Click here. Profits from the sale of issue one will go to fund the production of issues two through five. I’m also trying to solicit donations via Kickstarter.com Click here. Eventually, I’d like to see all five issues bound into one graphic novel. But for now, I just want to finish the story.

Matthew Lickona is a staff writer for The San Diego Reader, a weekly newspaper. He is also the author of Swimming with Scapulars: True Confessions of a Young Catholic, published in 2005 by Loyola Press.


READER COMMENTS

Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 7:08 AM By Maryanne Leonard
As a teenaged victim of rape, a sexually transmitted disease, an unexpected pregnancy, and a forced abortion against my will, a war perpetrated by others on the playing field of my body and mind carried out in the days prior to legalized abortion, I feel qualified to rejoice at Matthew Lickona's mind-expanding exploration of the topic of a baby's struggle to survive in an unfriendly setting. His work is brilliantly insightful and vastly human, and I hold it up to you for consideration, recognition, sharing, celebration and support.

Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 7:30 AM By Maria
The whole concept sounds easy to distort. In some ways that is precisely what many people feel, a sense of threat from the consequences of their desires and actions. A vindictive baby does not say "respect life" to me.

Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 11:00 AM By words save lives
Matt, you're pro-baby -- so please, from now on, say "baby," not "fetus." And please don't call babies "it." There's a definite reason the pro-aborts always say "fetus," always say "it," and are careful to never say "baby": They are propagandizing -- in order to depersonalize the babies. Well-meaning pro-lifers need to recognize the pro-aborts' propaganda terminology and never use it.

Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 11:54 AM By Anne T.
If this comic strip leads to women not getting involved in taking any harmful drugs during their pregnancies or having abortions, I applaud it, but if it discourages some others from protecting children who survive abortion, I can not applaud it. It seems to me that there might be a double-edged sword here. I hope I am wrong.

Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 12:28 PM By John F. Maguire
The Italian film director Federico Fellini -- a friend, by the way, of the Archbishop of Genoa, Giuseppe Cardinal Siri -- was a comic strip artist before he became a filmmaker. There is, I venture, a strong affinity between comic strip art and film art. Both arts require an ability to previsualize. Both arts require an ability to story-board. Both arts require an aptitude for montage. ~ Maybe, Matt, I should also mention another Italian filmmaker -- Vittoria de Sica, whose film _Umberto D_, though it studies the problem of aging, evokes the same humanism that can be found in Gary Cangemi's comic strip _Umberto the Unborn_. I am confident that both Vittoria de Sica and Federico Fellini, from their own elementary experience, would agree with you, that "like movies, comics can work on a really visceral level, because the pictures tell much of the story." Congratulations, Matt, on your important and challenging work.

Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 1:58 PM By Richard Flores
It is so easy to forget that there are typically numerous options that are never considered with respect to so-called "crisis" pregnancies! (Of course, Planned Parenthood virtually NEVER discusses this with vulnerable women at TAXPAYER-FUNDED counseling centers!) We must begin from the perspective that there is a live baby involved! Once we recognize this fact, we must make every attempt to save that precious gift from God while doing everything possible to help the mother physically, emotionally, spiritually, and financially. In today's world, there is virtually NO reason for a mother to feel that she has NO options other than abortion for it is simply NOT true! The constraints of 50 years ago no longer exist. In reality, it is a war against greed, for that is the true motivation of the abortion industry...PROFIT! We must ensure that ALL women know that there is a tremendous support system available to ALL that is understanding and compassionate! They no longer have allow abortionists to murder their babies! We must all support the various crisis pregnancy organizations! (As well as the organizations that are educating the public, such as "Justice For All", and helping "post-abortion" women, such as Racheal's Vineyard!)

Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 2:50 PM By Lickona
Thank you kindly, all. I suppose there is some risk involved in such a story, but I thought it a risk worth taking.

Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 3:26 PM By JLS
I believe "Alphonse" marks the invention of the lightbulb for the prolife movement, in its effort to contact the deep wellsprings of the public unconscious, an art genre that can travel through the walls of conscience established by the culture of death. It operates at a level that is universal and prescinds the malformation of social ideologies.

Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 4:24 PM By Sister Act
In reply to Words Save Lives: It's true -- the word *fetus* (Latin for "little one") is sometimes used to dehumanize the preborn infant by using this traditionally medical but admittedly "endistancing" word *fetus* for what we, upon seeing it, would spontaneously refer to as a "baby" or a "child." Still, WSL, your position on this question is, I think, overdrawn. You say: "Never use [the word *fetus*]." "Please, from now on, say 'baby', not 'fetus'." That, I think, is to ask too much. Obviously, to begin with, it is a gain and not a loss to use both words in the same sentence. For example, Right to Life of Michigan's _Chronology of a New Life_ reads: "By eight weeks [into embryonic development] all body systems are present, and from now on changes will be primarily in size and refinement of body parts already formed. The tiny baby at this stage is called a fetus, Latin for 'offspring' or 'young one.'" The word *fetus*, then, need not dehumanize the preborn infant -- and, depending upon context, often does not dehumanize the preborn infant.

Posted Monday, June 29, 2009 8:13 AM By JLS
Sister Act, your act is too much. Every human fetus including an embryonic stem cell is a baby soul who will live forever, the execution of which has already been judged by God.

Posted Monday, June 29, 2009 5:21 PM By Sister Act
Sorry, JLS, you are really going to have to absorb posts before you comment on them. No where in my post does the Right to Life of Michigan or I deny ensoulment. No where in my post does the RLM or I deny the immortality of the soul.

Posted Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:08 PM By JLS
SA, not interested in the details of error. If I spot the error, then I'll comment on it. Your thesis that error can be validated by detailed argument is ridiculous. What you are attempting, as always, is to divert the charitable efforts of actual prolife people from their means of explaining what God gives them to see and explain. This particular method you use is called reductionism, or making a mole hill out of a mountain.

Posted Wednesday, July 01, 2009 7:13 PM By Sister Act
Sorry, JLS, you are really going to have to absorb posts before you comment on them. No where in my posts have I ever advanced "the thesis that error can be validated by detailed arguments." Error, rather, can be better and more accurately identified by detailed arguments.

Posted Thursday, July 02, 2009 11:44 AM By words save lives
Dear Sister Act, It proves nothing whatsoever that one pro-life group said, "is called a fetus." Who is that referring to -- who does it mean is doing the calling? A baby "is called a fetus" by Planned Parenthood, by NARAL, by NOW, by every pro-abortion politician, and by every single abortionist in the USA. That is bad company for pro-lifers to keep. We pro-lifers need to stop doing the pro-aborts a favor by using their language. We need to do preborn babies a life-saving favor and call them babies.

Posted Thursday, July 02, 2009 6:44 PM By JLS
SA, often, as I point out, the post is completely revealed in the first few lines. On occasion I have been called to task, and have gone back to find that I missed or misunderstood something. You advance the error by demonstration, not by declaration. As you might or might not know, SA, there are categories of things and when some categories are introduced, they often have already been thoroughly dealt with. There are two ways to go about commenting on such: One is what I often do which is to assume from experience that the argument is posited by a hostile. I see you as hostile to the Church, and therefore I treat your arguments in this light. The second way is to assume the argument is put forth for the purpose of seeking the truth. In this case I deal with the points or enough points to steer or follow in the direction of truth. I do not see your posts as truth seeking posts. Your pattern when you lose an argument is to leave it at that point. That pattern is what I'm keying in on. Three of the arguers that have held up over the millenia are Job, Aristotle and St Thomas Aquinas. There is also Jesus Christ, but His method requires something more than only data that is available to all. He teaches that man lives on not only bread but on every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. In union with God through Jesus Christ we can access this resource. In this resource we have whatever is necessary for our situation. It is not purely intellectual, since it is fuller and deeper than this. This is why so many souls find great comfort and service in lives of prayer and can handle all obstacles to the true faith, even obstacles such as their own errors.

Post your Comment
Name:
Email: (Optional: Will not display)
Comment:
 
Comments are limited to 1500 characters, and cannot contain offensive or libelous language. For security, comments cannot contain html tags, including < and > symbols - and NO URLS or LINKS. Comments will appear after they have been approved by the editor. Inclusion of your email address is optional so the editor may contact you.



Calcatholic Mobile
Optimized for your
mobile device











Visitors since January 1st, 2009:
javascript hit counter

website created by Vigil Studios © 2006 -  www.vigilstudios.com